TRAUMA YELLOW
  • Clinical
    • Discharge Macros
    • Suboxone
    • Procedure Macros
    • Exam Macros
    • Pediatric Macros
    • Antibiogram
    • Follow Up
    • 2023 MDM
    • Heart Pathway
    • Jeromy's Macros
  • Education
    • EM Education
    • Critical Care
    • FOAM
  • Orientation
    • Dept Orientation
    • Cerner
    • Dragon
  • Links
    • Clinical Links
    • StatMacros
    • ICU Bootcamp
  • Private
    • MCS
    • GWU Contacts & Map

EKG Challenge #4: 61 yo male with chest pain

11/7/2017

2 Comments

 
61 year old presents to the ED with chest pain radiating to his ​​shoulder
Picture
What is the diagnosis?
Anterior STEMI
Elevations of the ST segments in the precordial leads. There are ST depressions (reciprocal changes) inferiorly (Green arrows), poor R wave progression (Red) and T waves that are more symmetric (yellow). Additionally the patient is 61 years old.
Picture
Why Not...
Why is this not Benign Early Repolarization?
The differentiation of benign ST elevations (BER) and Anterior STEMI can be difficult. There are a number of characteristics which are suggestive of BER vs. STEMI. Make sure to examine for other ischemic changes. Our job is to exclude MI and BER should be diagnosis of exclusion. Some features suggestive of each in below table.
Picture
Learn more
Consider using the Subtle Anterior STEMI calculator in cases where you are concerned, but the EKG may be difficult to decipher
2 Comments

Post-MI Complications

9/27/2017

2 Comments

 

Mechanical Complications

Picture
Picture
Treatment for mechanical post-MI complications includes vasodilators and ACE inhibitors, as well as blood thinners in cases which have thrombi. 
  • Papillary Rupture & Mitral Regurgitation: Transient MR occurs in 13-45% of patients and typically requires no treatment. Papillary muscle rupture (1%) presents within the first day, and presents with a holosystolic murmur, pulmonary edema, and cardiogenic shock. Chest x-ray may show pulmonary edema, and an echo with color flow can diagnose the rupture. 
  • Septal Rupture: Typically present within 24 hours, 0.2% occurrence rate. Typically present with acute onset chest pain and a new holosystolic murmur. A ventricular conduction delay may also be present. Treatment is surgical, however while waiting consider vasodilators to decrease left to right shunting.
  • Ventricular Free Wall Rupture: Three types of rupture exist; Type 1 present within 24 hours with a full thickness rupture, Type 2 present 1-3 days after MI with slow erosion of the myocardium, and Type 3 presents later as the area surrounding the infarcted tissue breaks down. Patients present with acute onset chest pain, JVD, pericardial friction rub, low voltage EKG, and tamponade. 
  • Aneurysm: Thinning of the ventricular wall creating a bowed wall which is at risk for thrombus formation or rupture. The aneurysm can progress to dilated cardiomyopathy, may be silent, or produce a "to and fro" murmur and can be diagnosed by CT or echocardiogram. Occurs in 1-5% of MI patients in up to 6 weeks, and 1/3 of cases is fatal. 
  • Left Ventricular Failure

Ischemic Complications

  • Post-infarct Angina: Chest pain after an ischemic event, could be secondary to vasospam
  • Infarct Extension: Persistent thrombi causing additional infarction within the same area, usually associated with fibrinolytic therapy. 
  • Recurrent Infarction: New thrombi causing a new area of infarction.
  • Re-occlusion: Fibrinolytic therapy has a 5-10% while PCI has a 3% re-occlusion rate. Most patients present within 30 days, and typically associated with medication noncompliance. 

Pericarditis

  • Inflammatory Pericarditis
  • Dressler's Syndrome: Autoimmune reaction to myocardial antigens, presenting 2-8 weeks after MI. 
2 Comments

New Syncope Recommendations

9/7/2017

4 Comments

 
2017_Guidelines.pdf
File Size: 7007 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

​In-line with the month’s cardiology theme, this note from the TR desk will discuss the evaluation of syncope, and the brand new (2 days young) ACCF/AHA Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope.
 
TL;DR: Watch Sonal’s syncope lightning rounds, and consider using the San Fran or Boston (both links) syncope rules. Use the FREE DOTPHRASE to help remind yourself of syncope patients who may required admission.
 
The 2017 recommendations are the most evidence-based guidelines yet for the evaluation of syncope, and based on an extensive literature review and committee discussion which included emergency medicine physicians, ACEP, and SAEM! Studies report an estimated prevalence of a single episode of syncope at 19% of the population. Females have a higher prevalence of syncope, and those with chronic cardiac and vascular issues are more likely to have recurrent syncope. The most common cause of syncope is unknown in most cases (37%), followed by Reflex Syncope (21%), Cardiac Syncope (9%) and Orthostatic Hypotension (9%).
 ​
Picture
The recommendations include a relatively worthless chart (above) showing how to initially evaluate a patient with syncope, recommending a detailed history and examination including orthostatics and evaluation for new murmurs, and a neurological exam. There is also Level B evidence that syncope patients should be evaluated with an EKG (This is a level A recommendation from ACEP). Given Cardiac Syncope has a high risk of recurrence and death, this seems appropriate. The article goes on to recommend targeted lab testing in any patient where the initial evaluation and diagnosis is not crystal clear. If you were here for Dr. Batra’s excellent discussion on syncope last year, none of this is surprising to you.
 
The recommendations also discuss the use of many of the current Syncope Risk Scores, including the San Francisco Syncope Rule, Boston Syncope Rule, and Del Rosso (All three of these have Negative Predictive Values of 99%). This is probably the most important part, as we need to determine which patients are safe to discharge, versus those who should be admitted. When looking across all three rules, a few bit picture items come out; abnormal EKGs, a history of CHF or heart disease, age >65, and syncope either without a prodrome or while supine, are all concerning for higher-risk Cardiac Syncope. Additionally, we should consider alternative causes of syncope, including pulmonary embolism (DO NOT bring up the PESIT Trial), pregnancy, anemia/GI bleeding, and neurologic causes. As such, you can use the dotphrase below to help remind yourself of these potential causes, and reasons to consider admission for monitoring, Holter monitor placement, and potentially further workup.

Dotphrase/Macro

Pt here with syncope/near syncope. Seizure less likely given history and exam. No neurologic deficits on exam indicating a stroke, and no signs of head trauma or injury. Given no signs of trauma or neurologic deficit, I will withhold further imaging of the head per ACEP Choosing Wisely Recommendations. Additionally, ACEP clinical policy on syncope evaluation recommends laboratory testing and advanced investigative testing such as echocardiography or cranial CT scanning need not be routinely performed unless guided by specific findings in the history or physical examination.
 
Patient’s history includes _ prior syncopal events, _ CAD, _ DVT/PE, _ seizures. Cardiac evaluation today shows _ murmur, _ JVD, _ peripheral pulses and _ lower extremity edema. EKG today _ without signs of Brugada or QT shortening or prolongation.  _ PE risk factors. Neurologically _. Blood glucose _, _signs of hypoxia during event or currently, and _ intoxication complicating the patient’s presentation. Given this, the patient’s episode _.
Risk Factors for Serious Cause: older age, pre-syncopal exertion, history of cardiac disease including heart failure, family history of sudden death, recurrent episodes, recumbent episode, prolonged loss of consciousness, chest pain or palpitations. Age >65, and Hct <30%
 
San Francisco Syncope Rule (.ekmdmsanfran)CHF History
Hct <30%
EKG Abnormality
SOB
SBP < 90 mmHg at triage
4 Comments

Delta Troponin and the HEART Pathway

8/29/2017

2 Comments

 
The “Delta Trop” is not a rule out test! It should be used in conjunction with the HEART score to have a conversation with the patient about risks/benefits of discharge vs admission during a low-risk chest pain evaluation.

The “Delta Trop” refers to serial troponin testing, anywhere from 2 to 6 hours between the first and second troponin. As troponin testing has improved, the time between each test has been lowered. The most recent data recommends 3 hours between each troponin when the high-sensitivity test is used. The delta troponin is not a “Rule Out”; it is used in addition to the rest of the patient’s visit to help risk stratify them into low, moderate, or high risk chest pain.
Picture
The HEART Pathway combines the patient’s HEART score with two serial troponins at zero and three hours. Observational studies showed 20% of patients with chest pain can be safely discharged utilizing this protocol, while maintaining a negative predictive value of Major Cardiac Event at >99%. This is actually a lower rate of MACE than the traditional HEART score alone (1.0% versus 1.7%). A recent controlled trial increased early discharges by 21.3%, decreased cardiac testing by 12.1%, and decreased length of stay by 12 hours!
Just because we are discharging people, however, doesn’t mean they have been ‘ruled out’ for cardiac issues. Remember, 1% of those discharged had a major cardiac event within 30 days. The “Delta Trop” should be used as a shared decision making tool where the patient is provided the information and risks/benefits of admission versus discharge. Attached is the University of Maryland shared decision making tool, which is used in conjunction with a bedside discussion, to explain the risks and benefits.

Picture
maryland_heart.pdf
File Size: 937 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

Shared Decision Making

When you identify a patient with a low heart score (1-3) you can use this dotphrase to improve your documentation of your shared decision making conversation, and to make sure you are not forgetting alternative causes of chest pain. Remember, that by hitting “F3” your cursor will jump to the next “_”

Patient HEART score 0-3, with risk of MACE 1.7% within 6 weeks, discussed with patient the potential for symptoms to be cardiac in nature and the need for follow up and return precautions. Other potential causes of the patient's presentation were considered; PERC _. Well's _. Pain not consistent with aortic etiology. Physical exam reassuring without signs of pneumothorax, pulmonary infection, heart failure exacerbation, or respiratory failure. Initial troponin negative. Discussed with patient the possibility of approximately 2% of an adverse cardiac event within the next 4-6 weeks, as well as options for further treatment, including observation admission, a second troponin at 3 hours, or discharge. After this discussion, the patient elected to _. ​
HEART Pathway.pdf
File Size: 1059 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

2 Comments

Pulmonary Embolism in Cardiac Arrest

8/23/2017

2 Comments

 
Pulmonary embolisms present with a broad variety of symptoms from chest pain to shortness of breath, and even fevers. Common exam findings include tachypnea and tachycardia. Risk factors include recent surgery, trauma, prolonged immobility, active cancer, birth control pills or hormone replacement therapy, or a history of prior embolism. 

Definitions

  • Acute: Occuring with immediate symptoms
  • Subacute: Presenting with days or weeks or occlusion
  • Chronic: develops pulmonary hypertension overtime
  • Massive: High risk embolism with hypotension, hemodynamically unstable, and potentially causing right heart failure and obstructive shock. 
  • Submassive: Right ventricular dysfunction but stable. 
  • Saddle: Embolism at the bifurcation of the main pulmonary artery. 
  • Subsegmental: Occlusion of smaller vessels which is most likely to cause necrosis 

Pulmonary Embolism is the Arresting Patient

Patients who arrest with a strong suspicion of pulmonary embolism may be treated with TPA. Bedside ultrasound should be used to help rule out alternative causes, such as tamponade or aortic dissection. Bedside ultrasound should also be used to evaluate for right heart strain prior to TPA. 

The initial dose of TPA in a cardiac arrest varies depending on what study is being evaluated. Some doses include an initial bolus of 10-15mg of TPA followed by an influsion of 85-90mg over an hour. Local protocol calls for a single bolus of 50mg over 2 minutes in cardiac arrest. This should be followed by at least 15-20 additional minutes of CPR to allow for TPA to circulate. A second dose could be considered. 

Current data shows that there is no difference in outcome when comparing patients who do and do not receive TPA during cardiac arrest. The same data also does not show increased risk of severe bleeding when comparing these populations. Undifferentiated cardiac arrest is NOT an indication for TPA. 
2 Comments

Emergent Treatment of Hyperkalemia

4/26/2017

2 Comments

 
Picture
In patients with bradycardias or cardiac arrest, have a high index of suspicion for hyperkalemia, especially in patients with renal failure or hemodialysis. Death from hyperkalemia is typically secondary to diastolic arrest or fibrillation, and common symptoms include weakness, paresthesias, and nausea/vomiting. 

Read More
2 Comments

Causes of ST elevation

1/11/2017

2 Comments

 
Six common causes of ST elevation (J point 1mm above the baseline)
  • STEMI
  • Benign early repolarization (BEP)
  • Bundle Branch Block
  • Pericarditis
  • LV Aneurysm
  • Vasospasm
Evaluating for concerning causes of ST elevation: 
  1. ​Does the story fit? 
  2. Do EKG changes follow an anatomic pattern? BEP should ONLY be in the anterior leads. Any ST changes outside the anterior leads should be investigated further, regardles of morphology. 
  3. Is ST elevation morphology typical? STEMI ST elevation typically creates a "frowny face" pattern, unlike BEP, which creates a "happy face" ST segment. 
  4. Are there reciprocal changes? PAILS mneumonic (posterior --> anterior, anterior--> inferior, inferior --> lateral, lateral --> septal)
  5. Are there changes from a prior EKG? 
  6. Are there changes in repeat EKGs?
  7. QTc? Narrow QTcs are typically not associated with STEMIs. 
2 Comments
    Categories

     

    All
    Abx
    Article
    Cardiac
    EKG
    EKG Challenge
    GI Bleed
    Grand Rounds
    Headache
    ICU
    Orthopedic
    Pain
    Peds
    Reading
    Stroke
    Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
    Syncope
    Teaching Pearl
    Trauma
    Travel
    Zika

    Archive

     

    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015

    Picture
    Please read our Terms of Use.
Donate
This site is independently owned and operated and not affiliated with the George Washington University, George Washington University Hospital, or Medical Faculty Associates. All information on this site is the opinion of the author alone and in no way should be seen to represent the views of the George Washington University, George Washington University Hospital, or Medical Faculty Associates. The information on this page is for personal use only and should not be see as medical advice or used directly for patient care. The author provides no guarantee of the accuracy of the information provided on this page. ​

​Please refer to our Terms of Use. 
  • Clinical
    • Discharge Macros
    • Suboxone
    • Procedure Macros
    • Exam Macros
    • Pediatric Macros
    • Antibiogram
    • Follow Up
    • 2023 MDM
    • Heart Pathway
    • Jeromy's Macros
  • Education
    • EM Education
    • Critical Care
    • FOAM
  • Orientation
    • Dept Orientation
    • Cerner
    • Dragon
  • Links
    • Clinical Links
    • StatMacros
    • ICU Bootcamp
  • Private
    • MCS
    • GWU Contacts & Map